Those who wish to control

This article, sent to me, is about what most of us do not want to recognize or acknowledge. Perhaps we need to look more closely...
"The following quote, on how to brainwash a nation, comes from a communist manual. It could just as well have been written by controllers that are in our world today..

"The first thing to be degraded in any nation is the state of Man, himself. Nations which have high ethical tone are difficult to conquer. Their loyalties are hard to shake, their allegiance to their leaders is fanatical, and what they usually call their spiritual integrity cannot be violated by duress. It is not efficient to attack a nation in such a frame of mind. It is the basic purpose of [mind-control] to reduce that state of mind to a point where it can be ordered and enslaved. Thus, the first target is Man, himself. He must be degraded from a spiritual being to an animalistic reaction pattern. He must think of himself as an animal, capable only of animalistic reactions. He must no longer think of himself, or of his fellows, as capable of ‘spiritual endurance’ or nobility... "

Appropriate ingredients basic to the controlling of a group of people (or individuals) is the same-- fear and trauma. These methods have been systemically been used repeatedly to conquer the unwilling and unwitting independent person or nation for many centuries with unbridaled success.

A system of values is then drilled into the people. Any person who is not brought up or taught to dedicate personal rights and possessions to [the system], will end up with all types of forces brought into their lives, such as insecurity, worry, anger, envy, jealousy and tension. (ie. Loss of choice as to what our child learns in school, loss of job, loss of home, food and gas prices and availability of necessities, etc.)

If people are allowed free will, they often will reject the life style programmed into them, which has often been layered into their minds over time to insure that moral weaknesses exist.

It may be shocking to realize that people are specifically programmed to resist Life's grace and love, and to have, instead, something, or some group to direct hate towards. This is deliberate and not is left to chance. It is accomplished by utilizing a number of things in the person's life.

A major area that is tampered with is the self-image a person has of themselves. This self-image is what we think of ourselves, and it is geared on a spiritual level. A person who is consistently belittled and compared to others (at school, at work, TV commercials and 'entertainment' programs that are broadcast daily making a person look and/or feel inadequate, etc.) begins to lose their self-perceived self-image.

When people are not allowed to accept themselves as they normally would 'see' and feel about themselves, they end up resisting the goodness that Life has to offer. Another repercussion of this constant bombardment is that they cannot accept the goodness in others, as well.

To constantly have negative and positive scenarios thrown into people's minds, which are diametrically opposed to each other’s qualities, only insures that if they would discover each of the influence in their minds, that they would reject wanting to learn about one or the other part, and would go into denial of whichever part’s existence they are rejecting. This is how the programming and mind-control is being linked into a belief system.

Thoughts of wholesomeness, health, love and compassion have slowly been replaced with thoughts of violence, unworthiness, hate, insecurity through the bombardment of negative and often traumatic news and images that people are presented with on a daily basis.
Rejection is also a common tool used by people everywhere in the world in behavioral environments.. Rejection is used by people to protect themselves, however, it creates a sine wave of hills and valleys. When people feel rejected, they will either try to perform to meet up to expectations, or they will retaliate against being rejected. Both behaviors are extremes.

Retaliation and rejection are both tools of bondage commonly used by a controlling entity. A controlling entity will deliberately use these tools to get a person to feel either rejected or angry. If a person (or nation) latches onto either side of the sine wave, they will set in motion a dynamic where they will end up with the other side of the curve. The reason for this is because the human mind has an innate desire to balance things out. If we feel rejection, then we may reta2C drugs, and even death.

In addition, we have become so dependent on other outside sources for our own survival that we have a deep fear that is often not consciously acknowledged. We have to depend on other outside sources for our education, our food and often even our water supply, as well as how we utilize our transportation (buy gas, etc.), or are able to clothe ourselves, and right on down the list, including the toilet paper we purchase. All this fear of self-preservation (whether individual or societal) by remaining in the programming (or unconsciously accepting what is presented to us on a daily basis) will be transferred to loyalty to the ones doing the controlling. It is exactly where these controllers want us to be. Entire nations become totally dependent on them for everything. That is the plan. In that way, we become- or have become, as the case may be- subservient to them. Anytime people reject truth for safety and peace, because of our fear for self-preservation, we accept a lie, and eventually we come to believe the lie as truth.

Remember the old adage, 'the truth shall set you free'? All these manipulations and lies lead to bondage. They create strongholds that are nearly impossible to break away from.. If truth sets you free, then slavery would mean, by definition, "not to have truth."
An important tool used in mind-control programming is the creation and use of images. Think about worship- it is image oriented. We have a natural bent to want to see what we think is important to us. This is the power of images. The eyes, and what they behold is a primal and foremost important tool used in programming and accepting belief. What you see is integrated into the mind easily and accepted as reality. Thus, if you are subjected to violence on an everyday level, you will come to think that it is a common part of living. You will ultimately believe it is far more common than it actually is. It de-sensitizes your reaction to it- it becomes common fare/expected, and one no longer is repulsed by it. The person may even come to enjoy it- watching 'action' films by preference to watching something more loving. Because images are so prominently used today, a balanced outlook and/or discussion of the spiritual ramifications of images (& their creation) is a rare subject.

Something to remember is that duplicity- the use of mirror or imitation images- in controlling people has been around a very long time. The elite were taught, by Machiavelli, for example, how to rule through duplicity--that is, to rule using imitation images."

Ponder that...

Surprise, surprise!

I recently received this, and thought I'd pass it along. DO check it out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3aCfR8rmrw&feature=youtu.be

I found it was well researched, and you can check out the information for yourselves.

I have no idea why anyone would think a 20 year old would have the necessary skill to be President, however, apparently there are some who think it possible....

hmmmm

Maybe we need to put some energy into this!

Since our reps are more interested in re-election than doing what is right for our Nation by upholding our Constitution, maybe we need to start recalling all those who have voted yes on the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012. Voting yes to this was not only unconstitutional, it has removed habeas corpus, thus given the military power to arrest anyone, indefinitely detain them without proof, real cause or recourse. That includes you!
Here's an interesting link about recall, and how to go about it:


If you have any doubt as to whether your Senators and Representatives voted for this unconstitutional bill, you can check by looking at the two links provided by , here:

Voting record of NDAA 2012 in the Senate:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2011-230

Voting record of NDAA 2012 in the House:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2011-375

One thing all these reps forgot is that they also can be turned against, arrested, held indefinitely, without proof of any crime, and without recourse. Unless, of course, they somehow manage to exempt themselves....

Take Action!!

It is definitely time to take action!
First of all, there was only ONE man who stood up and opposed the this. For Rhode Island.
According to WorldNetDaily:"When Congress adopted and Barack Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, alarms were raised over the possibility that it would allow the indefinite and rights-free detention of those who are called "belligerents," even if they are American citizens. While the argument over those provisions rages, one lawmaker in has jumped into action to protect the danger he sees for residents of his state". This can now be done without ANY PROOF.
Where are all the other Senators and Representatives on this? Why are they NOT protecting the rights of Americans and UPHOLDING our Constitutional rights??

Secondly, SOPA and PIPA are definite threats to our internet as we know it. These propsed actions will take away our freedom to communicate freely, and invader our privacy even more than what is already happening. The sad thing is that those who are for these actions ALREADY have the means available to protect their copyright material, so this kind of action is totally UNNECESSARY. There are thousands who are opposing this, and many will protesting by black-out- which will be happening very soon!

Third, we have an officer who thinks it is OK to take away people's weapons- even though that person had the proper permits- to protect themselves against their own gun??? What is up with that? You know if one place manages to pull this stunt off, others will follow suit. Our 2nd Amendment was put into place to protect us from these very types of incidents- tyrannical government!

PLEASE contact your reps on these matters. You can find out their contact info here:

Things that are going on are definitely NOT in OUR best interest! Let us take back the control of this country now. This governmental system was set up to be OUR servant - NOT the other way around!
Make your voice be heard!

Infusing Energy

In order to infuse energy into changing the way things have been to something far more positive, it may be prudent to read John Taylor Gatto's book called "THE UNDERGROUND HISTORY OF AMERICAN EDUCATION". You can find this book at http://www.johntaylorgatto.com

Once one sees how and when this country got in the mess we are in, the better able we are to put things right.

This book is a real eye-opener, and Mr. Gatto explains this in a very well researched manner.

Ask your library to get a copy, or purchase one yourself. Very important read, to be sure!

Check these out

If you are at all concerned about the coming election, please take the time to review these videos.
Ron Paul - Predictions in Due Time (Original)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM&feature=youtube_gdata_player

**************************************************************

The Amazingly Accurate Predictions of Ron Paul (Be sure to view Hillary Clinton's statements @ about 3:30 into the video!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_li-BCXKZA&feature=related



It seems to me that someone who upholds our Constitution, and can see the bumps in the road years ahead of time, and who has solutions is our best leader.
Aren't you tired of being lead down alleys and getting the daylights beat out of you by these other dishonest candidates??

Who is Rick Santorum?

In this on-going series, we will now ask 'who is Rick Santorum?'

So, Who is Rick Santorum?

According to an article written by Erick Erickson ,”we’re going to hear a lot about Universal Health Services (“UHS”). Santorum’s involvement in UHS is one of the significant bits of his private sector experience.
After his 18 point loss in 2006, UHS appointed Rick Santorum to its Board of Directors.
On May 16, 2007, Santorum acquired 10,000 options to purchase Class B common stock. On November 21, 2009, he received another option for 5,000. In 2010, it was options for 15,000 shares and another 15,000 as recently as January 21, 2011, as Santorum begin to entertain thoughts of running for President.
On June 15, 2011, Santorum resigned from the board of UHS.
Here’s why the media will be interested.
On March 2, 2010, nearly three years after Santorum was appointed to the UHS board of directors, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a complaint against UHS for billing Medicaid for “inpatient psychiatric care that was not provided.” The company received Medicaid funds to provide psychiatric counseling and treatment to boys ages 11 to 17.
According to the Department of Justice, UHS “[took] advantage of troubled children in order to feed their own desire for wealth.”
On July 29, 2010, an employee of the same Virginia adolescent psychiatric facility that was sued by DOJ filed suit against UHS for reprisal against her due to her “investigation of, reporting of, opposition to and refusal to participate in, her employer?s blatant and systemic criminal fraud against Medicaid engaged in by defendants[.]” See Barbara Jones v. Universal Health Services, Inc.,
According to Barbara Jones, the whistleblower who brought suit against UHS, local company management encouraged employees to conduct “drive by therapy sessions” as they passed patients in the hallway and then record the brief interactions as a thirty minute individual therapy sessions to be billed to Medicaid. Jones also testified in her court filings that she was ordered by the local CEO to fabricate a Medicaid billing form and was told, after she refused to do so, that she would not be
paid until the form was fabricated.
UHS tried to have the complaint dismissed not because of the veracity of the changes, but because it claimed Barbara Jones wasn’t an employee of UHS and therefore was not protected under a whistle blower statute.
Santorum possibly did not know about any of this, but in 2007 the federal government filed a lawsuit against UHS for Medicaid fraud going back all the way to 2004 — or well before Santorum was on the board. It’s kind of hard to claim complete ignorance of federal charges against a company on whose board he sat for over four years”.

Another article posted on http://mylibertynow.wordpress.com has this to say about Santorum:
“Former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum was blacklisted in 2006 by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a non-profit legal watchdog group dedicated to holding public officials accountable for their actions.
Illegal tax-paid school for his children
Reasons for the blacklisting included evidence of Santorum enrolling his children in Pennsylvania State-paid online classes while the were actually registered in Virginia, a political slight-of-hand that cost Pennsylvania tax-payers over $70,000.
AccuWeather bill
Santorum received $2,000 from a private weather information service two days before introducing a bill that would bar the tax-paid National Weather Service from distributing its information directly to the public. Santorum’s bill would have the National Weather Service use tax money to collect weather data, like it does today, but then mandate that it route the information to various private weather information companies, which would then presumably sell the same information to the public.
To add insult to injury, Santorum accused the National Weather Service of poorly predicting Hurricane Katrina, using the disaster as fodder for his palm-greased weather bill.
US Tobacco bill
Santorum received $3,000 from U.S. Tobacco Corporation a day after he voted against an amendment to a bill that would allow the Food and Drug Administration to regulate the tobacco industry.
Beer companies
Santorum received $6,000 from the Miller Brewing Company six months after Santorum introduced a bill that would cut federal excise tax that large brewing companies have to pay on beer in half.
Puerto Rico
Santorum received $48,765 from donors in Puero Rico. $34,500 was from hospital executives, administrators, and healthcare industry workers. Months prior, Santorum introduced a Puerto Rico hospital bail-out bill to coincide with the reform package Congress enacted that same year.
In April of the same year, Santorum introduced the Puerto Rico Medicare Reimbursment Equality Act of 2005, and has since raked in $44,750 from Puerto Rico, $10,000 confirmed from healthcare executives and administrators.
Energy interests
Santorum received at least $16,400 for his campaign committee and at least $8,500 to his PAC “America’s Foundation” after crafting a provision in the National Energy Security Act of 2000 to federally subsidize construction of a $612-million coal-to-diesel plant in Pennsylvania.
The legal watch-dog group concluded their report of Santorum by stating,
Federal law prohibits public officials from directly or indirectly demanding, seeking, receiving, accepting, or agreeing to receive or accept anything of value in return for being influenced in the performance of an official act. It is well-settled that accepting a contribution to a political campaign can constitute a bribe if a quid pro quo can be demonstrated.
“Value conservative” indeed!”